lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:09:40 +0100 From: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...eitzenberger.de> To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sk-drivers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sky2 bonding problem, 802.3ad Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> writes: > I'm unfamiliar with your particular switch, but usually this > kind of problem with bonding 802.3ad is in the switch interaction. The > switches I have (Cisco) require that 802.3ad mode be explicitly enabled > on whichever ports it is desired on, so it may be worthwhile to check > your switch and make sure that it really is configured for 802.3ad on > the sky2 ports. I am currently using port 1&2 and port 9&10 for bonding and have configured all four ports for the same aggregator ID 1, LCAP enabled. I also switched ports, that is, I changed host1 from using port 1&2 to use port 9&10 and vice versa. Note that I also used sk98lin which worked in my setup also. Do you still think it is a misconfigured switch? > If the switch is configured, you may want to also check to see > if it has counters for LACPDUs sent and received. If the switch is not > sending and receiving LACPDUs on the appropriate ports, then it's more > likely to be a communications problem somewhere (vs. an 802.3ad > negotiation problem). I will check tomorrow morning whether I see the LACPDUs in the log and report. Any more tests which may be helpfull? Thanks. /holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists