[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070216095647.GA24236@fluff.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:56:47 +0000
From: Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org.uk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm9000: do not kfree() netdevice
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:05:39PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The DM9000 network driver is calling kfree() on an netdev
> causing the system to oops if the probe fails. The right
> thing to do is call free_netdev().
>
> Thanks to Russell King for spotting this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
>
> diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/dm9000.c linux-2.6.20-dmfix/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> --- linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/dm9000.c 2007-02-04 18:44:54.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.20-dmfix/drivers/net/dm9000.c 2007-02-12 12:01:22.000000000 +0000
> @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pde
> printk("%s: not found (%d).\n", CARDNAME, ret);
>
> dm9000_release_board(pdev, db);
> - kfree(ndev);
> + free_netdev(ndev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ dm9000_drv_remove(struct platform_device
>
> unregister_netdev(ndev);
> dm9000_release_board(pdev, (board_info_t *) ndev->priv);
> - kfree(ndev); /* free device structure */
> + free_netdev(ndev); /* free device structure */
>
> PRINTK1("clean_module() exit\n");
Do I need to send this patch to a particual person
to ensure that it gets included into the kernel?
--
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists