netdev - Re: Re: Strange connection slowdown on pcnet32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070216222728.GF7585@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:27:28 -0500
From:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To:	pcnet32@...izon.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Strange connection slowdown on pcnet32

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:01:57PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> It seems whenever it gets stuck, it is always the same descripter it is
> stuck on.  Here is my current log:
> 
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0433, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0433, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0433, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0340
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: 0310 next->status: 0340
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 16 packets
> eth1: base: 0x05215812 status: 0310 next->status: 0310
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: netif_receive_skb(skb)
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 16 packets
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0310
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x6f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0310
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0033, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0310
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> eth1: interrupt  csr0=0x4f3 new csr=0x33, csr3=0x0000.
> eth1: exiting interrupt, csr0=0x0433, csr3=0x5f00.
> eth1: base: 0x04c51812 status: ffff8000 next->status: 0310
> eth1: pcnet32_poll: pcnet32_rx() got 0 packets
> 
> So somehow it ends up that when it reads the status of the descriptor at
> address 0x04c51812, it sees the status as 0x8000 (which means owned by
> the MAC I believe), even though the next descriptor in the ring has a
> sensible status, indicating that the descriptor is ready to be handled
> by the driver.  Since the descriptor isn't ready, we exit without
> handling anything and NAPI reschedules is the next time we get an
> interrupt, and after some random number of tries, we finally see the
> right status and handle the packet, along with a bunch of other packets
> waiting in the descriptor ring.  Then we seem to hit the exact same
> descriptor address again, with the same problem in the status we read,
> and again we are stuck for a while, until finally we see the right
> status, and another pile of packets get handled, and we again hit the
> same descriptor address and get stuck.
> 
> I believe doing ifconfig eth1 down;ifconfig eth1 up actually
> reinitialized the port with a new descriptor ring, but I could have got
> that part wrong looking at the code.  Either way it clears things up
> again for a while, until we get stuck again.
> 
> It makes me think the cpu somehow reads the memory location when the
> descriptor ring is empty, notes it is owned by the MAC, and stops
> handling packets (as it should), but then when the next receive occours,
> it doesn't read physical memory again for some odd reason, and see the
> previous status rather than the updated status.
> 
> Now for some reason it seems when the driver is not using NAPI, and
> hence not enabling and disabling interrupt masks, this problem somehow
> never occours (well at least I haven't managed to make it occour yet, so
> who knows for sure.  Certainly with NAPI enabled I can kill it in
> seconds).
> 
> Is there a way I can flush the CPU cache and force it to reread memory
> for an address range, or for all cache, or some other way to ensure the
> memory value I see is really the memory value that is in system memory
> for a given address?

It seems so far that if I change Kconfig.cpu and force it to enable
X86_OOSTORE for the MGEODE_GX1 then things behave properly.  Perhaps the
out of order memory access crap the MediaGX/Geode processors do is
having some affect, and enabling the code for wmb, etc, actually does
something.

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html