[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070219182642.GB10587@kvack.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:26:42 -0500
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, akepner@....com,
linux@...izon.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Extensible hashing and RCU
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:13:07PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> So even with a lazy hash function, 89 % of lookups are satisfied with less
> than 6 compares.
Which sucks, as those are typically going to be cache misses (costing many
hundreds of cpu cycles). Hash chains fair very poorly under DoS conditions,
and must be removed under a heavy load. Worst case handling is very
important next to common case.
-ben
--
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists