[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070221.053721.112287244.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:37:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, akepner@....com,
linux@...izon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcrl@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Extensible hashing and RCU
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:19:30 +0100
> Now, when the rate of lookups/inserts/delete is high, with totally random
> endpoints and cache *always* cold , 'tree structures' are not welcome (not
> cache friendly)
But what about if tree lookup were free :-)
This is why I consider Robert Olsson's trash work the most promising,
if we stick sockets into his full flow identified routing cache trie
entries, we can eliminate lookup altogether.
Just like how he already uses traffic inspection to kill cache entries
when FIN shutdown sequence is snooped, we can explicitly flush such
entries when socket is closed fully on local system.
Really, possibilities are truly endless with that thing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists