netdev - Re: [PATCHSET 0/18] FRTO: fixes and small changes + SACK enhanced version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702221305380.19465@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:32 +0200 (EET)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/18] FRTO: fixes and small changes + SACK enhanced
 version

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote:

> If you have any further bug fixes or enhancements to FRTO we
> can put it there too.

I tried the rate-halving approach in spurious RTO response and it looks 
really nice indeed. I'll try to also run couple of tests with the 
undo_cwr(,1) response too in near future to ensure that it doesn't 
cause immediate breakage with something.

Before preparing the submittable spurious RTO responses patch, I would 
like to know what is the preferred style for the response selector code 
(I'm controlling the response through frto_response sysctl)? switch? array 
of function pointers? If array, where to place it (considering the need 
for forward declarations and mixing of code and data in some approaches)?

-- 
 i.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html