[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <45E19076.1080600@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:34:46 +0200
From: Kristian Evensen <kristrev@....uio.no>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-net@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Adding data to SKB - odd checksum errors
Hello,
I am working on an algorithm to add data from the previous skb (on the
queue) to the front of the current skb. This should be beneficial for a
certain kind of TCP-traffic, and I am curious as to wether it will work
or not.
Currently I have implemented a small algorithm to copy the data that
works most of the time. It is called from write_xmit (right before the
while-loop) and performs a number of checks (does the skb fit in the
window, does it have enought space - mostly the same as the
retrans_try_collapse-function) before it copies the data. I first
"allocate" new data at the back of the skb using skb_put, and if that is
succsessfull I copy the new data (using first memmove to move the old
data and then memcpy), update the seq-number of this skb and calculate a
new checksum. The algorithm will (currently) not work with non-linear
skbs. I have pasted the code at the bottom of this mail.
The weird thing about this algorithm is that something will suddenly
make it go wrong/it makes something else go wrong, and the packets that
I send have the wrong TCP-checksum. I have looked around the code for
any counters I might have missed or similar, but I cant find any. If I
have understod skb's correctly, I shouldn't have to update any counters
except skb->len (which put does) since I dont expand the SKB I only use
the space already reserved for it.
Does anyone have any ideas to what might be wrong or can spot any
errors/misunderstandings in my code?
Thanks,
Kristian
The code:
This goes into write_xmit before the loop:
if(sysctl_tcp_thin_aggressive_bundling && tcp_stream_is_thin(tp)){
if(skb->prev != (struct sk_buff*) &(sk)->sk_write_queue
&& !(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags & TCPCB_FLAG_SYN)
&& (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags == 0 &&
skb_shinfo(skb->prev)->nr_frags == 0)){
tcp_trans_try_collapse2(sk, skb, tcp_current_mss(sk, 0))
}
}
This is the code that copies the data:
static int tcp_trans_try_collapse2(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
int mss_now)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
/* Make sure that this isnt refereced by somebody else
*/
if(!skb_cloned(skb)){
struct sk_buff *prev_skb = skb_copy(skb->prev, GFP_ATOMIC);
int skb_size = skb->len, prev_skb_size = prev_skb->len;
u16 flags = TCP_SKB_CB(prev_skb)->flags;
/* Since this technique currently does not support SACK, I
* return -1 if the previous has been SACK'd. */
if(TCP_SKB_CB(prev_skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED){
return -1;
}
/* Current skb is out of window. */
if (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->snd_una+tp->snd_wnd)){
return -1;
}
/* Punt if not enough space exists in the first SKB for
* the data in the second, or the total combined payload
* would exceed the MSS.
*/
if ((prev_skb_size > skb_tailroom(skb)) ||
((skb_size + prev_skb_size) > mss_now)){
return -1;
}
/*To avoid duplicate copies.*/
if(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq <= TCP_SKB_CB(prev_skb)->seq)
return -1;
/*First, check I have enough room*/
if(skb_tailroom(skb) < prev_skb->len)
return -1;
copy = skb_put(skb, prev_skb->len);
if(copy){
memmove(skb->data + prev_skb->len, skb->data, skb->len -
prev_skb->len);
memcpy(skb->data, prev_skb->data, prev_skb->len);
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = TCP_SKB_CB(prev_skb)->seq;
skb->csum = csum_partial(skb->data, skb->len, 0);
}
__kfree_skb(prev_skb);
}
return 1;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists