[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E46A4B.5090506@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:28:43 -0500
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: jacliburn@...lsouth.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remove irq_sem from atl1
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Chris Snook wrote:
>> From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
>>
>> Remove unnecessary irq_sem code from atl1 driver. Tested with no
>> problems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>
>
> ACK, but patch does not apply:
>
>
> Applying 'remove irq_sem from atl1'
>
> error: patch fragment without header at line 7: @@ -236,7 +236,6 @@
> struct atl1_adapter {
> error: patch fragment without header at line 21: @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@
> static int __devinit atl1_sw_init(struct
> error: patch fragment without header at line 29: @@ -272,8 +271,7 @@
> err_nomem:
> error: patch fragment without header at line 39: @@ -1205,7 +1203,6 @@
> static u32 atl1_configure(struct atl1_ad
> error: No changes
> Patch failed at 0004.
> When you have resolved this problem run "git-am --resolved".
> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git-am --skip".
Huh, looks like my mailer line-wrapped the headers. Patch didn't
complain, but I guess git is pickier. I've attached the patch to avoid
text mangling. Were there any problems with the e1000 and ixgb patches?
-- Chris
View attachment "remove-irq_sem-atl1.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1692 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists