netdev - TCP minisock tcp_create_openreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200702281203.38112@nienna>
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:03:37 +0100
From:	KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@...abit.hu>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: TCP minisock tcp_create_openreq_child() typo?

  Hi,

  While reading TCP minisock code I've found this suspiciously looking
code fragment:

- 8< -
struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);

	if (newsk != NULL) {
		const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
		struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
		struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
		struct tcp_sock *newtp;
- 8< -

  The above code initializes newicsk to inet_csk(sk), isn't that supposed
to be inet_csk(newsk)?  As far as I can tell this might leave
icsk_ack.last_seg_size zero even if we do have received data.

-- 
 Regards,
  Krisztian Kovacs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html