[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070228012510.GD1919@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:25:11 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NET]: Handle disabled preemption in gfp_any()
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:56:57AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:48:19 +0100
>
> > [NET]: Handle disabled preemption in gfp_any()
> >
> > ctnetlink uses netlink_unicast from an atomic_notifier_chain
> > (which is called within a RCU read side critical section)
> > without holding further locks. netlink_unicast calls netlink_trim
> > with the result of gfp_any() for the gfp flags, which are passed
> > down to pskb_expand_header. gfp_any() only checks for softirq
> > context and returns GFP_KERNEL, resulting in this warning:
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:3032
> > in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> > no locks held by rmmod/7010.
>
> Applied, good catch Patrick.
Breaks -rt, but I will submit a patch to Ingo to that will make this
fix work in the -rt context. I nevertheless agree that this is a good
catch!!!
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists