[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E5E72E.6070109@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:33:50 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4]: Store retransmit queue packets in RB tree.
David Miller a écrit :
> commit c387760826bd71103220e06ca7b0bf90a785567e
> Author: David S. Miller <davem@...set.davemloft.net>
> Date: Tue Feb 27 16:44:42 2007 -0800
>
> [TCP]: Store retransmit queue packets in RB tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 4ff3940..b70fd21 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> +#include <linux/rbtree.h>
>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> #include <asm/types.h>
> @@ -232,6 +233,8 @@ struct sk_buff {
> struct sk_buff *next;
> struct sk_buff *prev;
>
> + struct rb_node rb;
> +
> struct sock *sk;
> struct skb_timeval tstamp;
> struct net_device *dev;
I am not sure this rb_node placement is optimal. rb lookups want to access
rb_node and end_seq. They should be placed in the same cache line :)
next/prev were at the begining of sk_buff, there is no such constraint for rb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists