[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070228233512.d2d275a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:35:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: replace system timer with work queue
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:12:01 +0100 (CET) Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, review and apply to mm tree for further testing. The patch
> is also available at
> ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/bonding-workqueue.patch .
Please cc netdev@...r.kernel.org on net-related patches, thanks.
> Thank you,
> Jaroslav
>
> ==================
> bonding: replace system timer with work queue
>
> This patch replaces system timer with work queue in monitor functions.
> The reason for this change is that bonding handlers calls various
> sleeping functions from the timer handler which is not allowed.
Which sleeping functions? I'd have expected the kernel to spew runtime
warnings when this happens, but I don't recall any such reports.
> Because we cannot share the main workqueue threads (rtnl_lock is used
> also in linkwatch_event) - new bond workqueue thread is created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>
>
> diff -rupN linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> --- linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-02-04 19:44:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-02-28 09:19:43.831369202 +0100
> @@ -2097,8 +2097,10 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave
> * times out, and it selects an aggregator for the ports that are yet not
> * related to any aggregator, and selects the active aggregator for a bond.
> */
> -void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct bonding *bond)
> +void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> + struct ad_bond_info *ad_info = container_of(work, struct ad_bond_info, ad_work.work);
> + struct bonding *bond = (struct bonding *)((char *)ad_info - offsetof(struct bonding, ad_info));
We can use containers_of here too?
> -void bond_alb_monitor(struct bonding *bond)
> +void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
> + struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = container_of(work, struct alb_bond_info, alb_work.work);
> + struct bonding *bond = (struct bonding *)((char *)bond_info - offsetof(struct bonding, alb_info));
And here.
> + cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(bond_wq, &(BOND_AD_INFO(bond).ad_work));
> break;
> case BOND_MODE_TLB:
> case BOND_MODE_ALB:
> - del_timer_sync(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).alb_timer));
> + cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(bond_wq, &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).alb_work));
> break;
> default:
> break;
> @@ -4289,6 +4272,14 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *
> rwlock_init(&bond->lock);
> rwlock_init(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>
> + /* initialize work */
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->mii_work, (void *)&bond_mii_monitor);
> + if (params->mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->arp_work, (void *)&bond_activebackup_arp_mon);
> + } else {
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bond->arp_work, (void *)&bond_loadbalance_arp_mon);
> + }
Can we lose the unneeded braces, the unneeded typecasts and fit the code
into 80 cols?
<does all that>
yup.
> bond->params = *params; /* copy params struct */
>
> /* Initialize pointers */
> @@ -4782,6 +4773,12 @@ static int __init bonding_init(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> + bond_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("bond");
> + if (bond_wq == NULL) {
> + res = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> res = bond_create_sysfs();
> if (res)
> goto err;
> @@ -4807,6 +4804,7 @@ static void __exit bonding_exit(void)
>
> rtnl_lock();
> bond_free_all();
> + destroy_workqueue(bond_wq);
> bond_destroy_sysfs();
> rtnl_unlock();
Are you sure that all pending delayed works have been cancelled when we
destroy this workqueue?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists