[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070302.123325.28790131.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:33:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexandre.sidorenko@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SWS for rcvbuf < MTU
From: Alex Sidorenko <alexandre.sidorenko@...com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:21:58 -0500
> they told us that they use small rcvbuf to throttle bandwidth for this
> application. I explained it would be better to use TC for this purpose. They
> agreed and will probably redesign their application in the future, but they
> cannot do it right now. For the same reason they have to use the old 2.4.20
> for a while - in big companies the important production software cannot be
> changed quickly.
>
> The fix I suggested is trivial and should have no impact the case of
> rcvfbuf>mtu, so I think it makes sense to include it in upstream kernel.
I have no objection to the fix, especially John's version.
I was just curious about the app, thanks for the info :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists