netdev - Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH 2/3] bonding: only receive ARPs for us

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:38:22 -0800
From:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH 2/3] bonding: only receive ARPs for us 

Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:

>Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> 	The ARP validation code only needs ARPs for the bonding device.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>
>I seem to have lost the context of this.  Did this get discussed, and 
>need further revision?

	The further discussion can be (loosely) paraphrased as:

Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>: "Hey, this no workee with IPv6."

Me: "True, but bonding no workee with IPv6 at all."

Andy: "Oh, ok.  Ack."

	After which followed some preliminary yakkage about fixing up
said non-workee IPv6 support.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html