lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2007 03:30:00 +0100
From:	Florian Zumbiehl <florz@....de>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mostrows@...akeasy.net
Subject: Session ID 0 with PPPoE

Hi,

I noticed that the PPPoE code doesn't allow session id 0x0000 to be used
for an actual session but rather considers 0 a special value denoting
that the socket is unbound. Now, when reading RFC 2516, I couldn't really
find anything that would forbid 0x0000 as a session id. Only 0xffff "is
reserved for future use and MUST NOT be used", while 0x0000 is specified
as the only allowed value for the session id field on certain types of
packets, but neither can I find any statement that forbids 0x0000 as
an ordinary session identifier, nor can I find any reasons that would
prevent PPPoE from functioning properly with a session id of 0x0000.

Does anyone of you see any reason why a server would not be allowed to
select 0x0000 as the session id for a PPPoE session?

Florian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists