netdev - Re: [PATCH][BUG][SECURITY] Re: Weird problem with PPPoE on tap interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:09:39 +0100
From:	Florian Zumbiehl <florz@....de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mostrows@...akeasy.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG][SECURITY] Re: Weird problem with PPPoE on tap interface

> From: Florian Zumbiehl <florz@....de>
> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:55:16 +0100
> 
> > Below you find a slightly changed version of the patch
> 
> I already applied your first patch, so if you have any
> fixes to submit please provide them as relative patches
> to your original change.
> 
> Thank you.

Here you go ...

--- linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/pppoe.c.orig	2007-03-04 13:06:01.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/pppoe.c	2007-03-04 02:11:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
 
 	ret = item_hash_table[hash];
 
-	while (ret && !(cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) && ret->pppoe_dev->ifindex == ifindex))
+	while (ret && !(cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) && ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex))
 		ret = ret->next;
 
 	return ret;
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
 
 	ret = item_hash_table[hash];
 	while (ret) {
-		if (cmp_2_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, &po->pppoe_pa) && ret->pppoe_dev->ifindex == po->pppoe_dev->ifindex)
+		if (cmp_2_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, &po->pppoe_pa) && ret->pppoe_ifindex == po->pppoe_ifindex)
 			return -EALREADY;
 
 		ret = ret->next;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 	src = &item_hash_table[hash];
 
 	while (ret) {
-		if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) && ret->pppoe_dev->ifindex == ifindex) {
+		if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) && ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex) {
 			*src = ret->next;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
 
 	po = pppox_sk(sk);
 	if (po->pppoe_pa.sid) {
-		delete_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_dev->ifindex);
+		delete_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
 	}
 
 	if (po->pppoe_dev)
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@
 		pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
 
 		/* Delete the old binding */
-		delete_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid,po->pppoe_pa.remote,po->pppoe_dev->ifindex);
+		delete_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid,po->pppoe_pa.remote,po->pppoe_ifindex);
 
 		if(po->pppoe_dev)
 			dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
@@ -597,6 +597,7 @@
 			goto end;
 
 		po->pppoe_dev = dev;
+		po->pppoe_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
 
 		if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP))
 			goto err_put;
--- linux-2.6.20/include/linux/if_pppox.h.orig	2007-02-09 10:21:19.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/include/linux/if_pppox.h	2007-03-04 02:14:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 struct pppoe_opt {
 	struct net_device      *dev;	  /* device associated with socket*/
+	int			ifindex;  /* ifindex of device associated with socket */
 	struct pppoe_addr	pa;	  /* what this socket is bound to*/
 	struct sockaddr_pppox	relay;	  /* what socket data will be
 					     relayed to (PPPoE relaying) */
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@
 	unsigned short		num;
 };
 #define pppoe_dev	proto.pppoe.dev
+#define pppoe_ifindex	proto.pppoe.ifindex
 #define pppoe_pa	proto.pppoe.pa
 #define pppoe_relay	proto.pppoe.relay
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html