netdev - Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/03]: ktime + nano-second clock resolution for packet schedulers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:09:28 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC NET_SCHED 00/03]: ktime + nano-second clock resolution for
 packet schedulers

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:42:26 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:

> David Miller wrote:
> > Frankly, I think now that we have ktime and all of the proper generic
> > infrastructure to do this stuff properly, I think we should just use
> > ktime for the packet scheduler across the board and just delete all of
> > that old by-hand timekeeping selection crap from pkt_sched.h
> 
> Sounds good, I'm going to remove all other clock sources.
> Will resend in a couple of days after fixing a few more
> problems I noticed.
> 

Don't bother changing netem. I have a version that uses hrtimer's
and doesn't use PSCHED() clock source anymore.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html