[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173201286.3085.80.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:14:46 -0600
From: Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, paul.moore@...com, vyekkirala@...stedCS.com
Subject: Re: when having to acquire an SA, ipsec drops the packet
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 22:21 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> > 5. Around the time the set of SAs for OUT direction are to be
> > inserted into SAD, I see another ACQUIRE happening.
> >
> > I have not yet figured out where this second ACQUIRE comes from
> > and why it happens. As long as the minimal SA or set of valid outgoing
> > SAs exist in SAD, an ACQUIRE should not happen.
>
> I saw something similar to this some time ago when testing various
> failure modes, and discused it with Herbert.
>
> IIRC, there's a larval SA which is not torn down properly by Racoon once
> the full SA is established, and the larval SA keeps resending until it
> times out.
>
Ok, good to know.
I thought a bit more about this last night but am not
sure best way to fix it. Perhaps a way to keep larval
SA around until all SAs resulting from xfrm_vec[xfrm_nr]
are established... oh well, just thinking out loud... :-)
Joy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists