netdev - Re: TCP 2MSL on loopback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45EDF7BD.9060402@symas.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:22:37 -0800
From:	Howard Chu <hyc@...as.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rick.jones2@...com,
	dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP 2MSL on loopback

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> TCP can not assume anything about the path that a packet may take.
> We have declared a moratorium on loopback benchmark foolishness.
> Go optimize the idle loop instead ;-)
Sure - A delay loop with fewer instructions is a worthwhile optimization 
because it has less impact on a CPU's instruction cache...
-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html