[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081509110.28233@potato.cts.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:13:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@....ucla.edu>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100
patch)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> If you're running active-backup and not using the ARP monitor
> (arp_interval), then I'm not aware of any possible locking problems in
> bonding for the kernel version you reference (2.6.20.1).
I'm not using arp_interval.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Chris Stromsoe <cbs@....ucla.edu> wrote:
>
>> 1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive
>> ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unresponsive
>>
>> 2) ifup eth2
>> ifdown eth2
>>
>> perl -pi -e 's/eth2/eth3/' /etc/network/interfaces
>>
>> ifup eth3 <-- locks up here
>
> This would seem to suggest a problem with skge itself, although
> there might be some other interaction with bonding that causes the
> problems for that case.
In both of the above mentioned cases, I was not using bonding. That was
with the skge driver only.
-Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists