netdev - Re: wireless extensions vs. 64-bit architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070308.143419.75428407.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:34:19 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Cc:	jt@....hp.com, johannes@...solutions.net, jkm@...icescape.com,
	mb@...sch.de, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com, dcbw@...hat.com
Subject: Re: wireless extensions vs. 64-bit architectures

From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:17:56 -0800

> I think that this is not actually an option since
> powerpc64 is all 32-bit userspace.
> Maybe some other arch-es are like this also (?).

sparc64 is like this too
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html