netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45F294DC.50300@garzik.org>
Date:	Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:22:04 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Amit Kale <amitkale@...xen.com>
CC:	Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@...xen.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netxenproj@...syssoft.com, rob@...xen.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes

Amit Kale wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I will be sending updates to NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet driver in subsequent
>>> mails. The patches will be with respect to netdev#upstream.
>> Are you sure you don't want some of these in #upstream-fixes, queued for
>> 2.6.21-rc?
> 
> We really want them in both places. If we send them to #upstream-fixes, 
> they'll break #upstream. Should we send them against both of these branches?

Well, I can drop NetXen patches in #upstream, apply these to 
#upstream-fixes, and wait for a resend?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html