[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F20230.8020204@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:56:16 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fix net-2.6.22 on sparc
David Miller a écrit :
> Eric, please look at whole files you are editing :) I'm sure
> there is probably another case like this or two in the
> other platform socket ioctl allocations you made.
>
> Thanks.
>
> commit 9415518744729743b017da2e08a71c5bb0d94108
> Author: David S. Miller <davem@...set.davemloft.net>
> Date: Fri Mar 9 16:22:52 2007 -0800
>
> [NET]: Fix SO_TIMESTAMPNS values allocated to sparc.
>
> They confliced with SO_BROADCAST which already uses the
> value 0x0020.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Oh I see :( this one was really not easy to spot without close inspection :)
I just checked all arches and only sparc{64} have this strange SO_XXXX values
not linear. I wonder why this layout was chosen ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists