netdev - Re: [patch 4/4] [TULIP] Rev tulip version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020703120344n3f5ed52axf0bc1c109b549535@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:12 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Valerie Henson" <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] [TULIP] Rev tulip version

Hi,

On 3/12/07, Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> --- tulip-2.6-mm-linux.orig/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
> +++ tulip-2.6-mm-linux/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
> @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@
>
>  #define DRV_NAME       "tulip"
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_NAPI
> -#define DRV_VERSION    "1.1.14-NAPI" /* Keep at least for test */
> +#define DRV_VERSION    "1.1.15-NAPI" /* Keep at least for test */
>  #else
> -#define DRV_VERSION    "1.1.14"
> +#define DRV_VERSION    "1.1.15"
>  #endif
> -#define DRV_RELDATE    "May 11, 2002"
> +#define DRV_RELDATE    "Feb 27, 2007"

Why not just drop this? What purpose does a per-module revision have
for in-kernel drivers anyway?

                                      Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html