[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45F56458.9020403@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:31:52 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Amit Kale <amitkale@...xen.com>
CC: Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@...xen.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netxenproj@...syssoft.com, rob@...xen.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NetXen: Driver bug fixes
Amit Kale wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 16:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Amit Kale wrote:
>>> On Friday 09 March 2007 22:26, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>> Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will be sending updates to NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet driver in
>>>>> subsequent mails. The patches will be with respect to netdev#upstream.
>>>> Are you sure you don't want some of these in #upstream-fixes, queued for
>>>> 2.6.21-rc?
>>> We really want them in both places. If we send them to #upstream-fixes,
>>> they'll break #upstream. Should we send them against both of these
>>> branches?
>> Well, I can drop NetXen patches in #upstream, apply these to
>> #upstream-fixes, and wait for a resend?
>
> Could you do that, please? (drop NetXen patches in #upstream)
>
> We'll resend them against #upstream-fixes.
Will note.
Just to be clear, I presume that you will only be resending the bug
fixes against #upstream-fixes (2.6.21-rc). The multiple PCI function
stuff is way too big and invasive for 2.6.21-rc, which is why I
committed that to #upstream (2.6.22).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists