[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070313.171427.127590092.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:14:27 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
romieu@...zoreil.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 12/19] fix irq problem with NAPI + NETPOLL
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:35:13 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > netpoll_rx() should be invokable from hardware interrupt context.
> > What is the crash you are seeing?
>
> The problem is not netpoll_rx(). It should be called from irq context.
> The problem is, netif_receive_skb() is called from irq context though
> it seems not designed to do so.
Unfortunately I could not reproduce the crash, but IIRC the crash was
happened at upper protocol layer on hardware interrupt context.
Anyway, I think main path of netif_receive_skb() should not be
executed in hardware interrupt context. Is it wrong?
> > It looks like perhaps the kfree_skb() calls need to be modified
> > in __netpoll_rx().
>
> Well, it seems an another netpoll bug.
I suppose these kfree_skb() in __netpoll_rx() should be
dev_kfree_skb_any(). And I found an another abuse which is irrelevant
to netpoll. The netif_rx() calls kfree_skb() at its bottom. The
netif_rx() should be callable from hardware interrupt context, so it
should be changed to dev_kfree_skb_any(). Is it right?
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists