[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070313193149.GA27175@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:31:50 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Mark Huth <mhuth@...sta.com>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] natsemi: netpoll fixes
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:53:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> >confused and eventually locks up. Before locking up it will usually
> >report one or more oversided packets so this is a useful hint that we
> >should reset the recieve state machine in order to recover from this.
> That's all good by why we need to completely lose TX and other interrupts
> in the meantime? High inbound traffic doesn't necessarily mean a high
> outbound one, does it?
While the code in the driver can cope if the chip takes a while to
respond to the reset as far as I have been able to tell in testing
it does so close enough to immediately to avoid repeating the loop at
all. The effect on transmit processing should be minimal.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (308 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists