lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:24:07 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <>
To:	Johann Borck <>
Cc:, David Miller <>,
	Ulrich Drepper <>,
	Andrew Morton <>, netdev <>,
	Zach Brown <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Chase Venters <>,
	Jeff Garzik <>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>, Pavel Machek <>,
	Theodore Tso <>,
	Arjan van de Ven <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>
Subject: Re: considering kevent - the kernel development process

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Johann Borck ( wrote:
> So my questions are:
> What in general is wrong with kevent?
> What, in detail is wrong with kevent / its proposed interface?
> What features are missing?
> What are the (real) reasons for the way it is discussed?

Fsck it, Johann :)

It is a trend (a politics) to hide head into the sand and feel like
nothing happend - open source does not have mechanisms to force people
to do something (like comment on foreign ideas/implementations), 
so people make a look like problem does not exist and solve it using own way.

There will be tons of other interesting stuff, stay tuned :)

	Evgeniy Polyakov
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists