[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070316133238.GA2173@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:32:38 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] AF_RXRPC: Add blkcipher accessors for using kernel data directly [try #2]
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:50:16PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Add blkcipher accessors for using kernel data directly without the use of
> scatter lists.
I don't quite understand all these indirections. What's the problem
with just having a helper that builds the scatterlist for you?
> Also add a CRYPTO_ALG_DMA algorithm capability flag to permit or deny the use
> of DMA and hardware accelerators. A hardware accelerator may not be used to
> access any arbitrary piece of kernel memory lest it not be in a DMA'able
> region. Only software algorithms may do that.
We allow dma access to arbitary pieces of _dynamically_ allocated kernel
memory, and I think using the crypto subsystem on the stack is not allowed
at all.
But the even bigger question is, how does this relate to rxrpc?
> +static inline
> +void crypto_blkcipher_decrypt_kernel_iv(struct blkcipher_desc *desc,
very odd line split, please put the function name on the same line
as the qualifiers, or everything including the void on a line of it's
own. The first option seems to be the preffered style in this file.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists