[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070318155532.GG7958@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:55:32 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Subject: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?
Alexey, Roland,
In debugging kernel lockup that occurs with IP over InfiniBand in 2.6.21-rc4:
( https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402 )
I noticed the following code in dst_ifdown:
/* Dirty hack. We did it in 2.2 (in __dst_free),
* we have _very_ good reasons not to repeat
* this mistake in 2.3, but we have no choice
* now. _It_ _is_ _explicit_ _deliberate_
* _race_ _condition_.
*
* Commented and originally written by Alexey.
*/
static inline void dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev,
int unregister)
{
if (dst->ops->ifdown)
dst->ops->ifdown(dst, dev, unregister);
if (dev != dst->dev)
return;
if (!unregister) {
dst->input = dst_discard_in;
dst->output = dst_discard_out;
} else {
dst->dev = &loopback_dev;
dev_hold(&loopback_dev);
dev_put(dev);
if (dst->neighbour && dst->neighbour->dev == dev) {
dst->neighbour->dev = &loopback_dev;
dev_put(dev);
dev_hold(&loopback_dev);
}
}
}
The line dst->neighbour->dev = &loopback_dev breaks IP over InfiniBand,
simply because neighbour->parms still points to an entry that has
been set up with dev->neigh_setup call from IPoIB neighbour device.
So when neighbour->parms->neigh_destructor is called,
we get to ipoib_neigh_destructor in drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c,
and that in turn crashes since it needs an infiniband device
in neighbour dev pointer.
This is not new code, and should have triggered long time ago,
so I am not sure how come we are triggering this only now,
but somehow this did not lead to crashes in 2.6.20, but does now in 2.6.21-rc4.
Ideas on how to fix this?
Why is neighbour->dev changed here?
Can dst->neighbour be changed to point to NULL instead, and the neighbour
released?
Thanks very much,
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists