netdev - Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:05:34 +0300
From:	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband?

Hello!

> If a device driver sets neigh_destructor in neigh_params, this could
> get called after the device has been unregistered and the driver module
> removed.

It is the same problem: if dst->neighbour holds neighbour, it should
not hold device. parms->dev is not supposed to be used after
neigh_parms_release(). F.e. set parms->dev to NULL to catch bad references.

Do you search for a way to find real inifiniband device in
ipoib_neigh_destructor()? I guess you will not be able.
The problem is logical: if destructor needs device, neighbour entry
_somehow_ have to hold reference to the device (via neigh->dev, neigh->parms,
whatever). Hence, if we hold neighbour entry, unregister cannot be completed.
Therefore, destructor cannot refer to device. Q.E.D. :-)

Seems, releasing dst->neighbour is inevitable.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html