lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:19:58 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: dhowells@...hat.com Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, mrmacman_g4@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org, arjan@...radead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2] From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:41:38 +0000 > Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > So use SOCK_DGRAM, its clearly near enough. > > No, it's not. SOCK_DGRAM is an unreliable, unidirectional datagram passing > service. David we're not looking for a precise match, so please stop discussing this in those terms. We're looking for something close enough. The more and more I read Alan's arguments and your resistence to his logic, the more I side with Alan. He's definitely right on all the basic counts here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists