lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174382739.4864.11.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:25:39 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, chris@...lexsecurity.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: Oops in filter add

On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 08:29 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 07:58 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > 
> > Ok. It certainly used to matter in the old days.
> 
> 
> Actually it has never been used anywhere else but in ing_filter,
> it was introduced together with the TC actions.
> 

You are correct. I looked at old 2.4 and all i saw was:

----------
/* 
 revisit later: Use a private since lock dev->queue_lock is also
 used on the egress (might slow things for an iota)
*/
 
         if (dev->qdisc_ingress) {
                 spin_lock(&dev->queue_lock);
                 if ((q = dev->qdisc_ingress) != NULL)
                         fwres = q->enqueue(skb, q);
                 spin_unlock(&dev->queue_lock);
         }
------

So the resolution (as Dave points out) was wrong. In any case, restoring
queue_lock for now would slow things but will remove the race.

> 
> I'll try, but no promises, I'm a bit behind with various things myself.

I will ping you in a few days and if you havent done anything i will
take it up.
I am almost tempted to make the ingress filters to not have any
dependencies on egress whatsoever. It will create more locks but
will make the datapath faster. Actions can still be shared, but thats
lesser of an overhead.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ