netdev - Re: Oops in filter add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:57:57 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Chris Madden <chris@...lexsecurity.com>
CC:	hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops in filter add

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Chris Madden wrote:
> 
>>Ok, I replaced ingress_lock with queue_lock in ing_filter and it died in
>>the same place.  Trace below (looks to be substantively the same)...
>>
>>If I am reading tc_ctl_tfilter correctly, we are adding our new
>>tcf_proto to the end of the list, and it is getting used before the
>>change function is getting executed on it.   Locking the ingress_lock in
>>qdisc_lock_tree ( in addition to the extant queue_lock )seems to have
>>the same effect; I can get  a traceback from that if its useful.
> 
> 
> 
> The problem is that some classifiers (like basic, fw and route)
> implement empty ->init functions, although fw and route properly
> deal with it in their classification functions. The ->init function
> should allocate and initalize tp->root, which basic fails to do.
> If you give me a few hours I'll cook up a patch for this.


Actually its only cls_basic thats broken, in case of route and fw
its intentional for backwards-compatibility.

Can you try this patch please?


View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (823 bytes)