[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46001300.90804@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:59:44 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, lartc@...lman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [NET]: Fix fib_rules compatibility breakage
Thomas Graf wrote:
> @@ -242,10 +239,10 @@ static int fib4_rule_compare(struct fib_
> return 0;
> #endif
>
> - if (tb[FRA_SRC] && (rule4->src != nla_get_be32(tb[FRA_SRC])))
> + if (frh->src_len && (rule4->src != nla_get_be32(tb[FRA_SRC])))
> return 0;
>
> - if (tb[FRA_DST] && (rule4->dst != nla_get_be32(tb[FRA_DST])))
> + if (frh->dst_len && (rule4->dst != nla_get_be32(tb[FRA_DST])))
> return 0;
>
The presence of the attributes when src_len/dst_len is non-zero
is only verified in fib_newrule, so this looks like it might crash
when something broken sets src_len/dst_len to a non-zero value
without actually adding the attributes.
Other than that it looks fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists