netdev - Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to make them patchable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46003BF1.4090601@vmware.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:54:25 -0800
From:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mingo@...e.hu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	chrisw@...s-sol.org, anthony@...emonkey.ws, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops
 callsites to make them patchable

Andi Kleen wrote:
> One thing I was pondering was to replace the expensive popfs with
>
> bt  $IF,(%rsp) 
> jnc 1f 
> sti
> 1: 
>
> But would be mostly a P4 optimization again and I'm not 100% sure it is
> worth it.
>   

Worth it on 32-bit.  On AMD64, probably not.  On Intel 64-bit, maybe, 
but less important than in P4 days.

This could change character completely if used at the tail of a function 
where you now have

sti; 1: ret

Which generates an interrupt holdoff on the ret, an unusual thing to do.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html