lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:20:48 +0100
From:	Bernhard Walle <>
To:	Michael Chan <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix crash in tg3 when using irqpoll

Hello Michael,

* Michael Chan <> [2007-03-22 23:04]:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 21:46 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > This patch makes sure that even the tr32() instruction in the interrupt handler
> > is not executed which accesses PCI memory. Accessing PCI memory when
> > pci_restore_state() is called is a bad idea because that function modifies
> > the BARs of the PCI device.
> It is not caused by the BAR as it doesn't get changed in this case.  The
> pci_restore_state() call is to restore the memory enable bit in the PCI
> command register.  The tr32() call in tg3_interrupt() will cause a
> master abort if it is called before the memory enable bit has been
> restored.

Ok, thanks for the explanation. I wondered why you call
pci_restore_state() here, normally that's only called from .resume

> > --- mainline-msi-init.orig/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > +++ mainline-msi-init/drivers/net/tg3.c
> > @@ -3561,7 +3561,10 @@ static irqreturn_t tg3_interrupt(int irq
> >  	struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
> >  	struct tg3 *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> >  	struct tg3_hw_status *sblk = tp->hw_status;
> > -	unsigned int handled = 1;
> > +	unsigned int handled = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (tg3_irq_sync(tp))
> > +		goto out;
> This will break other things.  When we disable interrupts, we set the
> irq_sync flag but allow one more interrupt to be generated.  The irq
> handler will simply mask off the interrupt when it sees the irq_sync
> flag.  With the above change, the irq handler can no longer mask off
> this trailing interrupt and you may get screaming interrupts as a
> result.

You're right, I had only the case in mind where the network device
doesn't generate any interrupts (in initialisation phase and in
shutdown phase) because it's disabled in the device, and the interrupt
handler is only called because of IRQ-sharing/irqpoll.

> Thanks for reporting this.  I'll try to come up with a good solution.

Could you please CC me, I'd like to test it here.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists