lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:47:54 +0200
From:	"Denys" <>
To:	Patrick McHardy <>
Cc:	Linux Netdev List <>,
	Stephen Hemminger <>
Subject: Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?

Hi again

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:43:43 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Denys wrote:
> >>>Another thing, it is working well 
> >>>with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second 
> >>>buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible 
> >>
> >>I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
> >>would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
> >>for up to 64 seconds?
> > 
> > Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer 
> > bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - 
> > "rate" speed. I am wrong?
> No, I got confused, sorry about that. Your configuration allows 
> bursts up to 64 seconds long. I guess there's nothing wrong with that.
> I already asked Stephen to revert that patch, it was not meant to
> be included yet, unfortunately it made it into the release. Even
> more unfortunate is that it looks like we need larger types in the
> ABI to properly support nano-second resolution.

Thanks sir for your great help and great software and sorry that i took time, 
by not enough good explanation. 

Virtual ISP S.A.L.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists