lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eparis@...isplace.org
Cc:	jmorris@...ei.org, latten@...tin.ibm.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyekkirala@...stedCS.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:39:47 -0400

> It seems reasonable to me that the check for every policy (which is
> between current->security->sid and xp->security->ctx_sid) makes sense.
> There doesn't appear to me right offhand to be anything intrinsic in the
> code which says that a flush request must flush everything or nothing.

The "intrinsic" part comes from the heritage of routing daemons and
what they expect from flush operations, these assumption live in the
ipsec daemons as well.

A daemon, routing or ipsec, is flushing the tables in order to create
an entirely "clean slate", and they very much expect the policy and
state tables to be %100 empty after the operation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists