netdev - Re: RFC: Established connections hash function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <46038D0F.1060507@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:17:19 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nikb@...master.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Established connections hash function

Evgeniy Polyakov a ecrit :
> Call me a loooser which mail will be deleted on arrival, but...
> 
> jhash_2words(const, const, ((const << 16) | $sport) ^ $random)
> 
> where $sport is 1-65535 in a loop, and $random is pseudo-random number
> obtained on start.
> 
> Which is exactly the case of web server and attacker connects to 80 port
> from the same IP address and different source ports.
> 
> Result with jenkins:
> 1 23880
> 2 12108
> 3 4040
> 4 1019
> 5 200
> 6 30
> 7 8
> 8 1
> 
> Xor:
> 1 65536

So what ? You still think hash function must be bijective ? Come on !

You have a machine somewhere that allows 65536 concurrent connections coming 
from the same IP address ?

The last problem you have is the nature of tcp hash function.

Dont argue again with your pseudo science.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html