netdev - Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0703222056080.25271@d.namei>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:56:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyekkirala@...stedcs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Joy Latten wrote:

> > Perhaps a better semantic would be to fail the entire flush operation if 
> > one of the security checks failed.  e.g. loop through for permissions 
> > first, then if all ok, loop through for deletion.
> > 
> Ok, will code this up and test it if there are no objections.

I'd suggest making the permission loop a noop if CONFIG_SECURITY=n, via a 
static inline function.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html