netdev - Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1174675831.10788.79.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:50:31 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jmorris@...ei.org, latten@...tin.ibm.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyekkirala@...stedCS.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:46:48 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > A 'flush' has a semantic implication that all entries will be removed, and 
> > it should be atomic and either succeed or fail at that granularity.
> 
> Correct.

Fair enough, does it matter that we have no way to report failure back
to users who can no longer assume success?

-Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html