netdev - Re: [NET]: Fix breakage, use ip_hdr() for DF check in ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tgraf@...g.ch
Cc:	jheffner@....edu, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NET]: Fix breakage, use ip_hdr() for DF check in ip_forward

From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:37:31 +0200

> The patch [NET] Move DF check to ip_forward broke net-2.6.22 as
> skb->nh has been renamed to skb->network_header. Use ip_hdr().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>

Thanks Thomas.

John I'm extremely irritated.  You send me which is obviouly a feature
patch, which I'm obviously NOT going to apply to the current upstream
for 2.6.21, which is only accepting bug fixes, yet you do not test
compile your work and build your patches against my net-2.6.22 tree
which is where such feature patches are going to get applied?

That's just irresponsible, please don't do that again or you'll
be on my shit list for a good long while.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html