[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Line.LNX.4.64.0703281306560.4569@d.namei>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
cc: Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@...stedcs.com>,
Steve G <linux_4ever@...oo.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: LSPP kernels (was Re: [PATCH]: SAD sometimes has double SAs).
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Paris wrote:
> It is definitely NOT a shortcut into RHEL.
Ok, that was a poor choice of words on my part.
> I don't want to give the impression that upstream is not coming first.
> All the work is being done upstream either on netdev or linux-audit and
> then I pull it back into this LSPP kernel she talked about so that
> people interested primarily in the testing necessary to meet that
> particular government standard have a neat tidy little prebuild rpm to
> work with. Eventually all of these will show up in RHEL, but not until
> all of the patches i'm dealing with are upstream.
It seems my understanding wasn't clear on the overall workflow. If the
consensus is to stay with this scheme, then please disregard my previous
post.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists