[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070328.142254.94073845.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jmorris@...ei.org
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET : secure sequence number functions can use nsec
resolution instead of usec
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > Hello David
> >
> > We could use the nanosec resolution for various functions defined in drivers/char/random.c
> > (secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), secure_dccp_sequence_number())
> >
> > I am not sure if it's a netdev related patch or core kernel, so I have CC Andrew.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > [PATCH] NET : random functions can use nsec resolution instead of usec
> >
> > In order to get more randomness for secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(), secure_tcp_sequence_number(), secure_dccp_sequence_number() functions, we can use the high resolution time services, providing nanosec resolution.
> >
> > I've also done two kmalloc()/kzalloc() conversions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To me too, patch applied, thanks everyone.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists