netdev - Re: [PATCH] Inline net_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:00:36 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inline net_device_stats

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 08:52 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> It would make sense to do it per-cpu and 64 bit for the non-error counters.

Well, I looked at the e1000, it doesn't update on every packet anyway,
but seems to d/l from the card occasionally.  I assume this is the
method for high-speed drivers, otherwise we should split the tx & rx
parts of the structure.

64 bit introduces potential compatibility problems (exporting via proc).
And per-cpu feels like overkill to me.

Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html