[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5202357DB0@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:22:50 -0700
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: "Roberto Nibali" <ratz@...gphish.ch>,
"Yinghai Lu" <yinghai.lu@....com>
Cc: "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@....com>, "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<saw@....sw.com.sg>
Subject: RE: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal
Roberto Nibali wrote:
>>> Sounds sane to me. My overall opinion on eepro100 removal is that
>>> we're not there yet. Rare problem cases remain where e100 fails
>>> but eepro100 works, and it's older drivers so its low priority for
>>> everybody.
>>>
>>> Needs to happen, though...
>>
>> It seems that several Tyan Opteron base system that were using IPMI
>> add on card. the IPMI card share intel 100Mhz nic onboard. you need
>> to use eepro100 instead of e100 otherwise the e100 will shutdown OOB
>> (out of Band) connection for IPMI when shut down the OS.
>
> I find it hard to believe that something as common as IPMI in
> conjunction with the IPMI technology wasn't tested in Intel's lab.
> From my experience with Intel Server boards, onboard IPMI (all offered
> versions) and e100/e1000 NICs, I've never ever experienced any
> problems operating the BMC over the NIC. Also, I don't quite
> understand you point about the "IPMI card sharing the 100Mbit/s NIC"
> onboard? What exactly is shared?
It's a legit problem, but only with this *one* system.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists