netdev - Re: traffic shaping with NAT: IFB as IMQ replacement?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703300108.01994.gerd@egidy.de>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:08:00 +0200
From:	"Gerd v. Egidy" <gerd@...dy.de>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	Jens Thiele <karme@...lios.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linuximq@...oogroups.com
Subject: Re: traffic shaping with NAT: IFB as IMQ replacement?

Hi,

> > Linux router:
> > - does NAT for the LANs
> > - runs local processes communicating with the WAN/Internet
>
> I understand this requirement; unfortunately when i polled for features
> majority of people who emailed back were asking for the other things.
> I have changed my opinion a little since last time because the
> netfilter/contracking code now does netlink. I believe this could all be
> achieved in user space. Infact i have started writting some code - the

I'm also interested in shaping NAT. Would you mind telling us what you have in 
mind with your userspace code? Do you plan something like

tun -> your userspace code -> tun
             ^
             | (netlink)
             v
          conntrack

Kind regards,

Gerd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html