[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46128187.4090601@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:32:07 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPsec PMTUD problem
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:10:25PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>I noticed a problem with PMTUD between two IPsec tunnel endpoints.
>>When sending a packet larger than the PMTU with IP_DF from one
>>tunnel endpoint to the other, xfrm4_output sends an ICMP frag.
>>required with the IPsec MTU. Since the addresses match the tunnel
>>endpoints, this updates the MTU for the XFRM route with the value
>>that was calculated for the entire bundle, which in turn causes
>>a decrease for the bundle, resulting in further ICMP frag. required
>>messages until the minimum is reached.
>
>
> I presume you're using the same pair of addresses inside and
> outside the tunnel? If so the problem is that the kernel doesn't
> distinguish between internal ICMP errors and external ones.
> So when an MTU update occurs for the internal pair the external
> pair is also affected.
Exactly.
> We'd need some field in the routing cache to distinguish the
> two pairs.
I'm not sure I understand how this would work, the ICMP message
looks the same in both cases. Or are you suggesting to
differentiate based on the source of the ICMP message?
> Of course the easy work-around is to use distinct addresses
> within IPsec tunnels.
Yes, that would work as a workaround, but it still seems like
something worth fixing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists