[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:45:04 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@...elus.com>, Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Silent corruption with r8169
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> :
> Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@...elus.com> writes:
>
> [adding netdev]
> [meta-comment: I wish people wouldn't use such unnecessarily broad subjects
> -- how is it the x86-64 port's or AMD's fault when you have broken hardware?
> Would anybody write "Silent corruption on i386" or "Silent corruption
> on Intel" or "Silent corruption on Linux"?]
I hope you feel better now that I changed the subject.
Aaron, I see no clear suspect between 2.6.20.1 and current -git
that could explain nor fix a corruption in the r8169 driver.
Can you apply on top of latest 2.6.21-rc5-git the patches available at
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/linux/kernel/2.6.x/2.6.21-rc5/r8169-20070402
000[12]-r8169-foo-bar.patch have been committed a few minutes ago: you
should check if they apply or not.
netconsole appears compiled as a module. Is it used ?
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists